My Research
What is the proper role of government in a good society? I study how the American public wrestles with this ancient question in modern politics. Americans answer in strikingly different ways depending on their moral convictions, perceived self-interest, partisan loyalties, and their beliefs about the world. Government responds through policy, and those policies determine how society's benefits and burdens are distributed. I use survey experiments, field experiments, behavioral economics, and policy analysis to investigate how citizens think and vote, which policies pass, and ultimately how those policies affect ordinary people's lives.
— Current Projects —
-
The Burden of Taxes. Using methods from experimental economics, we test the burden hypothesis of redistribution preferences from earlier work (Carter et al, 2026). We find that people with low income vote for less redistribution when they must pay taxes to receive benefits. Removing the tax burden while keeping net benefits the same leads to robust support for redistribution among the poor, as rationality predicts.
-
Work Requirements. Safety-net programs like SNAP and Medicaid aim to promote self-reliance by requiring that beneficiaries work each month. As an ARTEMIS Fellow, I am working with J-PAL North America to craft a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to identify why some citizens who meet the work requirements still lose their benefits.
-
Moral Conviction. People become more politically active and resistant to compromise when they feel morally convicted about an issue. For example, people often view harm done to others as a matter of "right" and "wrong". Using a series of survey experiments, I investigate how people's moral conviction and political behavior depends on who has been harmed (e.g., an ally, enemy, criminal, or victim), and who has been blamed.
— Manuscripts Under Review —
-
Experimental Tests of the Merit Theory of Redistribution
Carter, B. and DeScioli, P.
- Invited by editor to revise and resubmit at American Political Science Review.
-
What Mobilizes the Mobilizers? How Text and Email Messages Shape GOTV Efforts
Carter, B., Caton, C., Kernell, G., Martin, A., McCabe, K., McCann, J., and Singh, R.
-
From Bipartisan to Partisan: How Elite Cues Override Aesthetic Intuition in Federal Architecture Preferences
Del Ponte, A., Carter, B.
-
Taxation Without Access: Deservingness Misperceptions and Support for Immigrant Health Insurance
Sawyer, M., Carter, B.
— Peer-Reviewed Publications —
-
Do Voters Understand the Benefits of Taxes?
Carter, B., Del Ponte, A., and DeScioli, P.
Perspectives on Politics, 2026
-
The Impact of Race and Physician–Patient Racial Concordance on the Incidence of Inpatient Advance Care Planning
Carter, B., Kaur-Gill, S., Murphy, M., O'Malley, J., and Barnato, A.
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2026
-
Does misunderstanding taxes inflate people's support for Medicare spending?
Carter, B.
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2025
-
Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Stage of Diagnosis of Lung Cancer for Rural and Urban Patients in New Hampshire
Carter, B., Denny, J., and Loehrer, A.
Journal of Rural Health, 2025
-
Neighborhood Trajectories from Historic Redlining to the Area Deprivation Index
Carlos, H., Weiss, J., Carter, B., Akre, E., Diaz, A., and Loehrer, A.
Journal of Urban Health, 2024
-
Examining Medicaid Waivers: An Opportunity to Promote Equity in Cancer Care
Green, L., Carter, B., and Loehrer, A.
Journal of the American Medical Association: Oncology, 2024
-
Residential Redlining, Neighborhood Trajectory, and Equity of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Care
Loehrer, A., Weiss, J., Chatoorgoon, K., Bello, O., Hasson, R., Diaz, A., Carter, B., Delmont, M., Akre, E., and Carlos, H.
Annals of Surgery, 2023
-
Integrating Web Applications into Popular Survey Platforms for Online Experiments
Carter, B. and Del Ponte, A.
Behavior Research Methods, 2022
-
Analogical Framing: How Policy Comparisons Alter Political Support for Health Care Reform
Barabas, J., Carter, B., and Shan, K.
American Politics Research, 2020